You might also try what AASECT-certified sex therapist Janet Brito, PhD, LCSW calls “the sandwich technique”-begin with an affectionate, positive assertion, then assert your desire, and finish with more words of affirmation. We foolishly end up repeating history, when the article is to advance. As to the final level, senior counsel for Mr Lehrmann recommended (not unfairly) that these factually inaccurate feedback mirror a broader aim of Ms Higgins to have interaction in commentary to shape the general public relations narrative from 2021 to attract consideration to what she and her supporters consider to be the unfairness of her account being scrutinised or questioned in any means, however the speech was given at a extremely emotional time, and it does not appear to me to have much present relevance. I’m undecided, even in case your Honour is inclined to make an order to require to me to supply, that-I ought to have it, however I must test. Even when you’re a security buff who may be very cautious to cover your path, who is to say your accomplice in crime is doing the same?
MR L. ZWIER: Your Honour, I can not say I was really prepared for this second. 164. Drum Teachers: To help your students understand 16th notes, have them say a 4 syllable phrase like “cat-er-pil-lar”. 208 As I’ve already noted, this cover-up or victimisation allegation was perceived by the Project workforce as being crucial side of the Project programme and its deployment meant her account achieved much notoriety and public interest. The thought that a girl could be as fairly as this one and yet dislike him so much was one of many saddest issues Jimmy had ever come throughout. 220 One would have thought this was an apparent and proper concession given the character of the occasion upon which the representations had been made, but it is now essential to deal additionally with separate submissions made by Ms Higgins. For comfort, I will deal with them in Section I.2 under.
Although, after all, I am conscious that the underlying fact of what was conveyed to the Project team is in a roundabout way related to the statutory qualified privilege defence (for causes I’ll clarify), these representations are conveniently handled in Section I.2 below. 218 I stress that Ms Higgins will not be a get together: no findings on this proceeding bind her and, of course, no relief is sought in this proceeding in relation to the Commonwealth Deed. These require some prolonged consideration however, in the long run, I consider they’re examples of Ms Higgins, then under stress but decidedly uninterested in pursuing a formal complaint, attempting to develop an account she may rationalise and perceived made her look higher within the eyes of others. SALAZAR: With respect to the Outer Continental Shelf, as President Obama made very clear through the campaign, we will look on the OCS in connection with a comprehensive energy program for the nation. 210 As I’ll explain below, what’s notable about this aspect of the account of Ms Higgins is just not solely its inconsistency with the contemporaneous data and its falsities, significantly as to Ms Higgins’ dealings with Ms Brown, but also its imprecisions and its reliance upon speculation and conjecture.
222 There isn’t any unfairness in Mr Lehrmann making this aspect of his submissions as to credit score. 219 As Annexure E reveals, submissions were made on this topic of credit score as it related to the Commonwealth Deed constantly with the categorical settlement between the events. 187 Unsurprisingly, counsel for Mr Lehrmann made a number of detailed attacks on the credit score of Ms Higgins in final submissions. 184 This submission has benefit up to some extent, and it has knowledgeable my consideration of essential, indeed critical, features of Ms Higgins’ proof, however, as I’ll explain, I am comfortably happy that a variety of credit score issues arising from a fair assessment of the evidence of Ms Higgins can’t be minimised in this fashion. 189 Like with Mr Lehrmann, I can’t consider her evidence as to what occurred in the Ministerial Suite on this section, but it’s handy to specify ten factors going to credit made by Mr Lehrmann and then evaluate the merits of them and other issues. You want being controlled. In the case of Mr Lehrmann, the untruths had been all over the shop (being a form of what is likely to be called “disorganised lying”); whereas the untruths of Ms Higgins: (a) will be placed in two temporal classes; (b) have been, in the latter category, fairly organised; and (c) inside both categories, generally had a typical thread.